reinward // practitioner research

How are teams actually securing AI agents?

I'm researching how practitioners building with LLMs handle security and compliance: prompt injection, tool access, data leakage, and audit requirements. Your answers inform product research for Reinward, an AI agent security and compliance gateway built in the UK.

No marketing follows. I'll share the aggregated findings with everyone who takes part.

~5 minutes · 12 questions · findings shared back
section/01 → identity

About you

So responses can be credibly attributed, or anonymized if you prefer.

May I reference your input in my market research? [REQUIRED]

section/02 → current_state

Your current reality

What you're building and what already worries you.

Are you or your team building or deploying LLM based applications or agents? [REQUIRED]

Which security risks concern you most? [REQUIRED]

Pick as many as apply.

section/03 → the_gap

The gap

Whether a dedicated layer would earn a place in your stack.

If a gateway sat between your AI agents and your tools and data, enforcing access policies, blocking injections, and logging everything for compliance, would that solve a real problem for you? [REQUIRED]

Roughly what monthly budget could a problem like this justify for your team? [REQUIRED]

Interested in early access or being a design partner? [REQUIRED]

Your answers are stored for market research only. Attribution follows whatever you chose above. See our Privacy Policy.